Integrated microalgal biorefinery – Routes, energy, economic and environmental perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131245Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Technological progress in microalgal fuels is yet to attain commercial feasibility.

  • Integration of different biofuel productions is inevitable for cost effectiveness.

  • Increased energy outputs (MJ kg−1) 15.4 and 18.8 were attained on integration.

  • Integration resulted in cost reduction by 60% in biomass production for biodiesel.

  • Integrated production of fuel and bioproduct seems attractive and lucrative.

Abstract

Commercialization of microalgal biofuels is not yet attained even after plentiful of research and extensive scientific projects. Expending the cost and energy for producing single microalgal product proven to be unviable, and hence integrating multiple product generation from single batch of biomass was considered as effective. This review focusses on delineating the challenges associated with individual fuel production pathways and merits of integrating different fuel production pathways. The advantages of integrated microalgal biorefinery have been summarized along with energy output and economic impact. Integrated production of different biofuels enhances the energy output significantly (biodiesel + biocrude oil - 18.8 MJ kg−1, biodiesel + bioethanol - 15.4 MJ kg−1, biodiesel + biogas - 13.4 MJ kg−1) and reduced the cost of biomass production by about 60% and 40% for biodiesel and other fuel productions, respectively. In addition, the integrated production of bioproducts with fuels also emphasized in the present study.

Introduction

Ceaseless rise of global energy demand and severe environmental degradation are the two inexorable issues associated with conventional fuel usage which dictate the urge for finding alternative energy resources (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020). For almost three decades, biofuel research receives paramount importance along with eventual growth and development (Mathimani et al., 2019). Microalgae offer a significant space for the promising production of biofuels and other value-added products (Deviram et al., 2020; Raheem et al., 2018). The prominence of microalgae-based fuel production heavily relies on three aspects which include theoretical possibility for profitable production, environmental sustainability with reduced carbon footprints and value rich quality for complete utilization (Lakshmikandan et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020). On considering the first aspect, microalgae hold the supremacy in areal lipid productivity than any other terrestrial crops and enhancing the tendency of lipid accumulation is an added attractive feature (Remmers et al., 2018). The second aspect deals with mitigating the adverse environmental effects such as CO2 emission control, CO2 capture and wastewater treatment (Barati et al., 2021; de Assis et al., 2019). Generating microalgal biomass using wastewater as nutrient medium or flue gas as source of CO2 are comprehensively advantageous in terms of mitigating wastes and emissions leading to sustainable environment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) study stating that microalgal biomass production under flue gas could contribute to positive impact on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction (75%) (Yadav et al., 2020). The third aspect of microalgae-based fuel production is charging towards complete utilization of microalgal biomass to achieve zero wastes approach. For instance, it was suggested that isolating particular fraction for different bioenergy product seems costlier, and inevitable requirements for cost-effective technologies are needed especially for extracting the biocomponents (protein, lipids and carbohydrates) (Vermuë et al., 2018). These three promising aspects of microalgae show the unleashing potential of microalgae which supports its continual exploration for fuel and other applications. Also, utilizing wastes (wastewater and CO2 from flue gas) for biomass production and biorefinery potential with many value-added integrated productions and zero waste concept might lead to prominent pavement of microalgae towards cleaner and sustainable production in every dimension. The potential bottlenecks in microalgal based productions are i) costlier process and ii) infancy level of understanding about integrated microalgal biorefinery. For the first case, the economic and energy demerits associated with each step such as cultivation, optimization towards hyper accumulating targeted product, harvesting, product extraction and fuel conversion were separately studied and potential optimization techniques for universal applications are scattered (Arcigni et al., 2019). Hence, a consolidated approach which involves the sequential process optimization is required to achieve finite improvement in terms of economy and energy perspective. El-Dalatony et al. (2019) demonstrated an integrated method in which successive fermentation of microalgal biomass was involved in the order of carbohydrates, proteins followed by transesterification of lipids in Chlamydomonas mexicana. Following to which, the leftover lipids and glycerol from transesterification can be further fermented. Such high throughput fermentation resulted in sectioned production of bioethanol (from carbohydrates), higher alcohols (from proteins), biobutanol (from the leftover lipids and glycerol) along with biodiesel from transesterification of lipids resulting in about 89% conversion efficiency and about 46% of overall energy recovery were achieved. González-González et al. (2018) suggested that integration of biodiesel production with biogas production in a closed loop can substantially improve the energy, economy and environmental safety (carbon balance). In another study, Gluconobacter oxydans was used for producing dihydroxyacetone from glycerol byproduct obtained from biodiesel produced from Scenedesmus dimorphus (Carbajal et al., 2020). In the last decade, the focus on microalgal biorefineries are intensified and byproducts of biodiesel conversions are potentially used (Silva et al., 2016).

Fig. 1 displays the published literatures with the term “microalgal biorefinery” in last decade which shows an increase in emerging interests over the concept. Such increase in interest towards integrated microalgal biorefinery is needed to attain further detailed insights about tailoring microalgal biochemical composition for multiple products. In such context, the review mainly focused on summarizing the challenges (technological and economic) associated with individual product (fuels) production from microalgae and suggesting the merits of different integrated microalgal biorefinery. To date, no other review articles encompass such depiction of integrated biofuel production pathways along with energy outputs and economic vitalities. To present with comprehensiveness, this review also analyzed the associated challenges in energy, economic and environmental aspects.

Section snippets

Research methodology

The present review focusses on discussing the available routes of microalgal biomass to biofuel conversion at its current status and challenges to find a prospecting way based on energy output. It has been proved by myriad of reports that microalgae display significant potential for producing multiple biofuels (biodiesel, bio-oil, biogas, etc.). Hence, the proposed concepts of integrated microalgal biorefinery for promoting economically viable process was discussed and emphasized at the end of

Common biofuels routes

An overview of microalgal technology including species selection, cultivation and harvesting was elaborately discussed in supplementary section. The biochemical composition of a species dictates the fate of its application in biofuel. Lipids of microalgae act as a raw material for biodiesel production, while residual biomass rich in carbohydrates can be used as a raw material for bioethanol or biogas production. In addition, the whole biomass can be converted directly into crude bio-oil by

Integrated production of biofuels and energy outputs

In an economic perspective, biorefinery is needed to achieve the cost-effectiveness and many such research developments are encouraged nowadays. Microalgal biomass possesses magnificent proportions of energy which can be significantly utilized through different pathways. The mode of microalgal biomass conversion found to be crucial in terms of energy recovery and for the maximum utilization of biomass. In the present review, one kg of microalgal biomass was presumed and the possible energy

Evaluating the cost reduction of integrated production pathways

Table 4 evaluates the cost effectiveness and cost reduction by employing the proposed integration of biofuel production pathways (3, 4, and 5) on compared to individual biofuel production pathways. Microalgae with 40% of lipid content was assumed for the evaluation and cost required for generating and harvesting biomass which are the factors used for the evaluation as the integration routes could effectively share the biomass production cost. For instance, biomass production and harvest cost

Pigments, proteins, vitamins and essential fatty acids

Pigments display extensive applications in the field of cosmetics, food industries, biomaterial production, animal feed, etc. In nutritional aspect, pigments were found useful in acting as precursors for vitamin. Microalgae offers greater range of pigments which are familiarly carotenoids, chlorophylls and phycobilins (Sharma and Sharma, 2017). Among pigments, astaxanthin is one vital pigment which is possessing significant antioxidant activities (immune enhancement, anti-inflammatory and

Environmental impact and challenges need to be addressed in microalgal biorefinery

Beyond improving the economy and making the production process commercially viable, the microalgal process also possesses significant environmental impacts. Ammonia is one of the primary nitrogen sources for microalgae and the production of about 2 kg of ammonia results in CO2 emission of about 1.2 kg which is potentially deteriorating the environment (Jegathese and Farid, 2014). In order to control such pollution causing nutrient production, recycling and reusing are vital options which serve

Conclusion

Integrated microalgal biorefinery has been identified as the promising solution for high cost microalgal biofuel production. This review reemphasizes the urge of integrated biorefinery with various routes and revealed its advantages in terms of energy and economic perspective. Integrating biodiesel and bio-oil production pathway resulted in greater energy output of about 18.8 MJ kg−1 which is suggested as prominent pathway for the production of liquid fuels. Evaluating the cost reduction showed

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Authors sincerely acknowledge the financial support extended by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51676091, 52050410328), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funds (No. 2018M630529) and the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province.

References (112)

  • V. Bhola et al.

    Effects of parameters affecting biomass yield and thermal behaviour of Chlorella vulgaris

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2011)
  • N. Bordoloi et al.

    Characterization of bio-oil and its sub-fractions from pyrolysis of Scenedesmus dimorphus

    Renew. Energy

    (2016)
  • F.C. Borges et al.

    Fast microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae using microwave absorbent and HZSM-5 catalyst

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • M. Branco-Vieira et al.

    Environmental assessment of industrial production of microalgal biodiesel in central-south Chile

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • L. Brennan et al.

    Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2010)
  • S. Chaudry et al.

    Pathways of processing of wet microalgae for liquid fuel production: a critical review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • C.-L. Chen et al.

    Biodiesel production from wet microalgae feedstock using sequential wet extraction/transesterification and direct transesterification processes

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • C.-Y. Chen et al.

    Engineering strategies for simultaneous enhancement of C-phycocyanin production and CO2 fixation with Spirulina platensis

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Effects of the aqueous phase recycling on bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina Platensis, α-cellulose, and lignin

    Energy

    (2019)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Catalytic deoxygenation co-pyrolysis of bamboo wastes and microalgae with biochar catalyst

    Energy

    (2018)
  • J. Cheng et al.

    Enhancing the growth rate and astaxanthin yield of Haematococcus pluvialis by nuclear irradiation and high concentration of carbon dioxide stress

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2016)
  • F. Chireshe et al.

    Production of low oxygen bio-oil via catalytic pyrolysis of forest residues in a kilogram-scale rotary kiln reactor

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • Y. Chisti

    Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2008)
  • G. Ciudad et al.

    Performance of an enzymatic extract in Botrycoccus braunii cell wall disruption

    J. Biosci. Bioeng.

    (2014)
  • M. Collotta et al.

    Comparative LCA of flocculation for the harvesting of microalgae for biofuels production

    Procedia CIRP

    (2017)
  • M.D.G. de Luna et al.

    In situ transesterification of Chlorella sp. microalgae using LiOH-pumice catalyst

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2017)
  • A. Dimitriadis et al.

    Hydrothermal liquefaction of various biomass and waste feedstocks for biocrude production: a state of the art review

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • Z. Du et al.

    Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae for biofuel production

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • M. Edelmann et al.

    Riboflavin, niacin, folate and vitamin B12 in commercial microalgae powders

    J. Food Compos. Anal.

    (2019)
  • M.M. El-Dalatony et al.

    Whole conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels through successive high-throughput fermentation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • S. Ghosh et al.

    Process intensification of biodiesel production from Chlorella sp. MJ 11/11 by single step transesterification

    Algal Res.

    (2017)
  • C. González-Fernández et al.

    Comparison of ultrasound and thermal pretreatment of Scenedesmus biomass on methane production

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • L.M. González-González et al.

    Biogas production coupled to repeat microalgae cultivation using a closed nutrient loop

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2018)
  • H. Guo et al.

    Biochemical features and bioethanol production of microalgae from coastal waters of Pearl River Delta

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • Y. Han et al.

    Hydrothermal liquefaction of marine microalgae biomass using co-solvents

    Algal Res.

    (2019)
  • A.E. Harman-Ware et al.

    Microalgae as a renewable fuel source: fast pyrolysis of Scenedesmus sp

    Renew. Energy

    (2013)
  • J. Hoffman et al.

    Techno-economic assessment of open microalgae production systems

    Algal Res.

    (2017)
  • N. Hossain et al.

    Life cycle assessment, energy balance and sensitivity analysis of bioethanol production from microalgae in a tropical country

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2019)
  • Z. Hu et al.

    The characteristic and evaluation method of fast pyrolysis of microalgae to produce syngas

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • F. Huang et al.

    Formation of nitrogen-containing compounds during microwave pyrolysis of microalgae: product distribution and reaction pathways

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • S. Jafarian et al.

    A comparative study on the quality of bioproducts derived from catalytic pyrolysis of green microalgae Spirulina (Arthrospira) plantensis over transition metals supported on HMS-ZSM5 composite

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2018)
  • E. Jankowska et al.

    Biogas from microalgae: review on microalgae's cultivation, harvesting and pretreatment for anaerobic digestion

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • X. Ji et al.

    The pyrolysis of lipid-extracted residue of Tribonema minus in a fixed-bed reactor

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis

    (2015)
  • H.M. Kim et al.

    Comparison of red microalgae (Porphyridium cruentum) culture conditions for bioethanol production

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • S.W. Kim et al.

    A comparative study of bio-oils from pyrolysis of microalgae and oil seed waste in a fluidized bed

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • W. Kong et al.

    Review on carbon dioxide fixation coupled with nutrients removal from wastewater by microalgae

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2021)
  • M. Lakshmikandan et al.

    Sustainable biomass production under CO2 conditions and effective wet microalgae lipid extraction for biodiesel production

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • J.-C. Lee et al.

    Convergence of direct-transesterification and anaerobic digestion for improved bioenergy potentials of microalgae

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • O.K. Lee et al.

    Bioethanol production from carbohydrate-enriched residual biomass obtained after lipid extraction of Chlorella sp. KR-1

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • L. Li et al.

    Towards biofuel generation III+: a sustainable industrial symbiosis design of Co-producing algal and cellulosic biofuels

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text