Abstract
Peanut skin is a by-product rich in bioactive compounds with high nutritional and pharmaceutical values. The phenolic fraction, rich in proanthocyanidins/procyanidins, is a relevant class of bioactive compounds, which has been increasingly applied as functional ingredients for food and pharmaceutical applications and is mostly recovered from peanut skins through low-pressure extraction methods. Therefore, the use of green high-pressure extractions is an interesting alternative to value this peanut by-product. This review addresses the benefits of the phenolic fraction recovered from peanut skin, with a focus on proanthocyanin/procyanidin compounds, and discusses the improvement of their activity, bioavailability, and protection, by methods such as encapsulation. Different applications for the proanthocyanidins, in the food and pharmaceutical industries, are also explored. Additionally, high-pressure green extraction methods, combined with micro/nanoencapsulation, using wall material derived from peanut industrial processing, may represent a promising biorefinery strategy to improve the bioavailability of proanthocyanidins recovered from underutilized peanut skins.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Food industries are redesigning their production chains to address the emerging consumer demand for high-nutritional foods, products with enhanced functional and physical properties, and enriched with health-promoting constituents (Galanakis, 2021). With population growth, emphasis is directed towards the reprocessing of agro-industrial by-products, as a contribution to circular economy, valuing the biorefinery concept by means of green processes applications (Benvenutti et al., 2021).
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oilseed cultivated and appreciated worldwide. The processing of peanut oilseeds provides various popular peanut goods, generating large amounts of by-products (Sorita et al., 2022). Among them, peanut meal (derived from oil production), skins, and shells are the main by-products of peanut processing, which are mostly used for animal feed (Sorita et al., 2020). Particularly, peanut skins are valuable by-products from peanut processing operations, with more than one million tons produced worldwide every year and presenting considerably high contents of proanthocyanidins and their isomers (Xu et al., 2022).
The phenolic-rich fraction recovered from peanut skins is becoming increasingly popular due to the growing demand for functional foods, beyond the interest from pharmaceutical industries. The use of the peanut-phenolic fraction (rich in procyanidins) in food and pharmaceutical formulations can promote several health benefits, such as antioxidant (Constanza et al., 2012), anti-cancer (Liu et al., 2020), cardioprotective (Rauf et al., 2019), anti-diabetic and anti-obesity (Unusan, 2020), antimicrobial (Camargo et al., 2017b), neuroprotective (Singh et al., 2017), antiviral (Makau et al., 2018), and anti-asthmatic (Kandhare et al., 2013).
In connection to that, this review evaluates possible uses for the phenolic-rich fraction from peanut skin, mainly composed by proanthocyanidins/procyanidins components, in food and pharmaceutical formulations, adding value to this underestimated by-product. For this purpose, a fast search at SCOPUS Database (up to June, 2022) shows that 2538 studies are relate to peanut and its by-products (“peanut”) AND (“by-products” OR “waste” OR “residue”). Refining the search, 86 works were founded related to peanut skin and phenolic compounds (“phenolic” AND “peanut skin”), showing the growing interest from the scientific community about phenolic compounds from food by-products, particularly peanut skin. Specifically, in the last 10 years (2012–2021), 61 works were published (71% of total studies), and 5 studies were published up to June 2022. The criteria used for article selection were within the title, abstract, and keywords. The USA, with 27 works, was the first in publication ranking, followed by Brazil (22 studies) and Argentina (9 studies). Additionally, among the 86 studies, 62 are related to agricultural and biological sciences; 32 to chemistry; 19 to biochemistry, genetic, and molecular biology; and 15 are related to chemical engineering, showing the multidisciplinary enrolled in this subject, rising the application possibilities.
To identify alternative sources of phenolic compounds and the efficient methods for their recovery is of utmost scientific and industrial interest. Then, within the viable sources of this relevant fraction, peanut skin emerges with high potential due to the relevant content of these components that can promote several health benefits. Because the recovery of phenolics from peanut skin can be achieved by several methods, this review provides an update about the extraction techniques, focusing on green methods with non-toxic solvents, such as supercritical fluid extractions (SFE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), subcritical water extraction (SFE), ultrasound-assisted extraction, and microwave-assisted extractions (MAE) and its combination, in a biorefinery concept.
Although some phenolic characteristics, such as fast delivery and degradation, combined with low solubility and bioavailability, may restrict its direct use in pharmaceutical and food formulations (Xu et al., 2022), nevertheless, encapsulation processes are exciting alternatives to overcome the restrictions for its applications, and these options are also compiled in this review.
Association of sustainable extraction methods (for selective extractions), health benefit characteristics, and encapsulation strategies can be an interesting way to value food by-products, allowing further applications of the recovered fractions in food and pharmaceutical products.
Therefore, the present review provides the connection of two strategies for the valorization of peanut by-product, the innovative and sustainable extraction methods and green encapsulation procedures. This approach can stimulate the circular economy, integrating the industry 4.0 design by means of developing green process and products.
Peanut: Increase in By-product Generation
The world population growth connected to the increasing use of oilseed commodities as input for biofuel production had led to higher demand for oil production, affecting consequently the oil prices (Shokoohi & Saghaian, 2022). For that reason, the oilseed production and market are growing fast, and the 5 main world producers of peanut in 2021 are shown in Fig. 1 (USDA, 2022).
China, India, Nigeria, the USA, and Sudan, the main peanut producers in 2021, were responsible for 69% of the world production, where China contributed most, with 36% of word production (18.2 K MT). India and Nigeria were the second and third highest peanut producers, being responsible for 14% (6.8 K MT) and 8% (4.22 K MT), respectively, followed by the USA and Sudan (6 and 5% of world production), providing 2.9 and 2.3 K MT, respectively.
The projection for 2022, related to peanut meal, destined for industrial uses, and oil consumption, indicates near historic levels, reaching the peanut production in the USA, while the Brazilian production is estimated to increase by 60% of the production compared to 2018/2019. Still for 2022, it is projected a peanut production rise in 17% related to whole seed, oils, and food uses (USDA, 2022).
Considering that most peanut-based products do not contain the red skin layer, the amount of this by-product is increasing. Besides, taking into account the circular economy context, the transformation of agro-industrial residues (like peanut skin), as sources of valuable products, contributes to sustainable industrial processes, and can be of relevance to contribute to peanut industrial processing. Then, because peanut skin represents about 3% of the peanut weight (Lorenzo et al., 2018; Sorita et al., 2020), and the world peanut production in 2021 was 50.22 K MT (USDA, 2022), it is estimated that approximately 1.50 K MT of peanut skin were generated in 2021. Also, considering the representative amount of phenolic compounds from peanut skin, this by-product can be considered an emerging and promising feedstock for the recovery of bioactive ingredients.
Therefore, with the increase in peanut skin generation, worldwide studies (mainly from the USA, Brazil, and Argentina, as reported in the “Introduction” section) have been focusing on the extraction of the phenolic-rich fraction from this valuable by-product, rising food and pharmaceutical applications, as substitute of synthetic additives, as discussed in the next sections.
Phenolic Compounds in Peanut By-products
Peanut skin contains several compounds (mainly phenolic components) with diverse potential biological activities. In nature, the phenolic compounds from plants (generally concentrated at the skins or peels) are responsible for color, taste, and flavor attributes, indicating the plant maturity. These compounds have two main functions: (i) protect against insects, pathogens, and herbivorous animals, and (ii) attract insects for flower pollination.
Phenolic compounds can be classified in four subgroups (categories): phenolic acids, flavonoids (including flavonols, flavones, flavanols, anthocyanidins, and isoflavones), tannins, and stilbenes (An et al., 2021; Neuenfeldt et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2017). Figure 2 illustrates the phenolic compounds identified in peanut by-products.
Phenolic acids are a minor phenolic group from peanut skins, mainly composed by coumaric, caffeic, and ferulic acids, and this class of components are represented by the phenolic compounds with one carboxylic acid group. Protocatechuic, ferulic, caffeic, and p-coumaric are the main compounds identified and quantified in peanut skin. Chlorogenic acids (and their monomers, quinic acid) can also be founded in peanut skin, although rarely, but their presence can be associated to peanut cultivars and industrial processing (Dean, 2020; Lan et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2013; Sarnoski et al., 2012a).
Stilbenes, also identified from peanut skin, are extensively recovered from numerous food by-products due to their valuable biological activities. Resveratrol is the main stilbene from peanut skin, among other derivatives such as isopentadienylresveratrol, piceatannol, piceid, and some prenylated resveratrol analogs. The resveratrol content varies with peanut cultivar and processing; for instance, Spanish skins (15.04 μg g−1) have higher content than Runner and Virginia types (4.30 and 3.66 μg g−1, respectively) (Francisco & Resurreccion, 2009).
Flavonoid components (monomeric and condensed) are the main fraction of phenolic compounds from peanut skin, such as catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin, catechin gallate, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin gallate, quercetin, and proanthocyanidins and a complex series of procyanidins oligomers, which have been already identified and quantified from this by-product. Then, because procyanidin (A-type procyanidin dimer, trimers, and tetramers) can achieve a remarkable value of 85.7% of the total phenolic components from peanut skin (Xu et al., 2022), the present study focuses on the flavonoid group (specifically, in proanthocyanidins/procyanidins oligomers), which is presented in terms structures and the biological activities associated.
Proanthocyanidins and Its Structures
Proanthocyanidins are high molecular weight polyphenolic compounds, which, for peanut skin, are originated from the polymerization of flan-3-ol by saturated linkage between two carbon molecules (C–C), and occasionally by C–O–C bonds, as shown in Fig. 3.
In Fig. 3(I), a general molecular structure of common monomeric anthocyanins (subclasses), such as procyanidins, prodelphinidins, propelargonidins, profisetinidins, prorobinetinidins, and proguibourtinidins, is shown (Xie & Dixon, 2005). These subgroups are obtained from depolymerization and/or decomposition at high temperature in acid medium. The most common subgroups from proanthocyanidins are the procyanidins, oligomers of (epi)catechin units, and their galloyl derivatives (Bansode et al., 2014), widely present in peanut skin.
The proanthocyanidin molecular structures, considering linkage types, are presented at Fig. 3(II, III), which show A-type (C4–C8 and C2–O7) and B-type (C4–C8 and C4–C6) proanthocyanidins, respectively. The linkage of monomeric units (Fig. 3(I)) occurs mostly between C4 from the “upper” monomeric unit and C8 or C6 from the “lower” monomeric unit (B-type, Fig. 3(III)), called B-type because the linkage is based on the lower unit, the B-ring. The most common B-type proanthocyanidin dimers are found in nature, frequently from plant tissues, the B1, B2, B3, and B4, which are related to C4–C8 bonding (Fig. 3(IV)). Types B5, B6, B7, and B8 are less frequent and related to C4–C6 bonds. Sometimes, an extra ether group is found between C2 and O5 or O7, and the structure is called A-type due to linkage based on A-ring; more specifically, the C-ring of the “upper” monomeric unit is linked with the A-ring of the “lower” monomeric unit (Fig. 3(II)) (Neto et al., 2020; Rauf et al., 2019), with A1 and A2 as the most common A-type proanthocyanidins (Fig. 3(IV)). The synthesis of proanthocyanidins from the chemical, biochemical, and molecular genetic perspectives is presented in detail by Xie and Dixon (2005).
The structure, the monomeric composition, the degree of polymerization, and the specific linkages of the proanthocyanidins affect their bioactivities (Dong et al., 2013). For instance, according to Andersen-Civil et al. (2021), the bioavailability, stability, and activity of polyphenolic compounds, such as proanthocyanidins, may be correlated with the amount of hydroxyl groups, mean polymerization, and/or bond type and position between the monomers. Besides, Vazquez-Flores et al. (2018) suggested that proanthocyanidins with low degree of polymerization are more apt to inhibit digestive enzymes, such as intestinal lipase, amylase, and proteases, due to their capacity to bind with specific cavities from the enzymes, better than polymer or oligomer molecules.
Proanthocyanidins/Procyanidins from Peanut By-products
Proanthocyanidins/procyanidins derived from plant and food by-products emerged as functional ingredients, attracting attention from the food industry and health organizations due to their well-being beneficial properties, such as the protective effect against diabetic retinopathy (Sun et al., 2016), complementary and alternative strategy to prevent skin cancer by attenuating the adverse UV radiation effects (Katiyar et al., 2017), and also atherosclerosis prevention, cardiovascular protection, and reduction of total cholesterol from blood plasm (Blade et al., 2010). Besides that, proanthocyanidins are related to maintaining vascular elasticity and normal blood pressure (Odai et al., 2019), among other health-promoting characteristics.
The linkage types from A- and B-proanthocyanidins affect their activities; for instance, A-type (peanut skin) has higher trypsin inhibitor activity and higher affinity for α-casein (useful for wall material attributes, facilitating encapsulation) and strongly inhibits α-amylase, compared to B-type (Le Bourvellec & Renard, 2018). Besides, A-type proanthocyanidins help prevent recurrent urinary tract infections, a property not observed from B-type proanthocyanidins (Liu et al., 2012). A comprehensive approach of the benefits of A- and B-type proanthocyanidins is discussed below.
Recently, several researchers have shown that peanut skins are excellent sources of phenolic compounds, particularly proanthocyanidins/procyanidins, present in high concentration (~86%) (Xu et al., 2022) with innumerous biological activities (Appeldoorn et al., 2009; Bodoira et al., 2019; Munekata et al., 2016; Oldoni et al., 2016). Then, Table 1 summarizes the scientific works related to the recovery of proanthocyanidins from peanut skin, associating with extraction methods, processing conditions applied, and the main results detected.
It is important to point that the content of proanthocyanidins from peanut skin by-products varies with the source, as well as the recovery and quantification procedures (Table 1 data). Besides, the proanthocyanidin content can be affected by several factors, such as (i) peanut cultivation, for instance, specie or variety, climate, and soil conditions; (ii) peanut processing, like mechanical peeling and roasting; and (iii) extraction conditions.
Chukwumah et al. (2012) compared the total proanthocyanidin content (in cyanidin chloride equivalent (CCE)) of twenty-seven cultivars from different regions, with results ranging from 0.101 to 1.030 mg CCE g−1 of peanut skins, where the lower value was from Valencia variety while the higher content was from Runner variety. Yu et al. (2006) showed that peanut processing (oilseed roasting) affected the procyanidin content from the skin, compared with non-roasted peanut skin. For instance, the content of trimer and tetramer proanthocyanidins reduced with temperature increase, from 0.221 and 0.296 mg g−1 (non-roasted skin) to 0.157 and 0.204 mg g−1 (roasted skin), respectively. Otherwise, the dimers’ content increases, from 0.111 (non-roasted skin) to 0.143 mg g−1 (roasted skin), due to degradation of larger proanthocyanidins into lower ones (dimers).
Most studies for the recovery of proanthocyanidins from peanut skins apply conventional extraction methods (maceration and Soxhlet extraction), which are generally highly time- and solvent-consuming. Mostly, these methods have low selectivity, resulting in less pure extracts, with residual solvent, that compromises its use for food industries (Belwal et al., 2020). In addition, the long extraction time that is normally required can cause proanthocyanidin degradation, reducing their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (Bodoira et al., 2017).
Usually, conventional extraction of proanthocyanidins from peanut skin requires two steps: lipid extraction by nonpolar solvents that act as a barrier for proanthocyanidins extraction, followed by polar solvent extraction, from defatted peanut skin, to obtain the polyphenol fraction (e.g., proanthocyanidins) (Tamkutė et al., 2020).
Larrauri et al. (2016) recovered proanthocyanidins from peanut skin by conventional three-step extraction: (1) lipid extraction by Soxhlet with n-hexane for 6 h, followed by (2) polyphenol extraction by maceration with ethanol/water (70:30 v/v) at room temperature for 24 h, and (3) purification with ethyl acetate in a column (Sephadex LH-20) eluted with ethanol. Fractions (2) and (3) were analyzed by HPLC–ESI–MS/MS, detecting phenolic acids (quinic, gallic, and cumaric acids), flavonoids (catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, isoquercetin, genistein, isorhamnetin, apigenin, chrysin, procyanidins, and proanthocyanidins), and stilbenes (resveratrol). The main proanthocyanidins from fraction (3) were as follows: procyanidin dimer A-type (31.49%), proanthocyanidin dimer (24.33%), and procyanidin dimer B-type (14.15%). Using four-step extraction, Munekata et al. (2016) recovered proanthocyanidins from peanut skin by (1) stirring maceration (ethanol/water 80:20 v/v) at 60 °C for 50 min, (2) 15-min sonication, (3) centrifugation (6000 rpm for 15 min), and (4) filtration.
The number of extraction steps, process conditions, recovery efficiency, and quality of the recovered fractions can be modified by the extraction method and solvent used. Alternative high-pressure methods and environmentally friendly solvents may contribute to green processes, stimulating the sustainable development (Benvenutti et al., 2021).
Innovative Extraction of Proanthocyanidins/Procyanidins
Recently, with the increasing demand of natural products, additives, or bioactive extracts for foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical applications, the extraction specialists have focused on improving the processes efficiency, reducing extraction time, number of operations, energy consumption, and amount of solvent, which reduce environmental impact, economical costs, and generated waste, but simultaneously keeping attention on the extract’s quality (Chemat et al., 2019).
Green extractions, besides reducing energy consumption, also allow the use of generally recognized as safe (GRAS) solvents and are applied for renewable natural products or underused by-products from industrial processes (Chemat et al., 2019; Moro et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). High-pressure methods such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) are within the promising techniques for the recovery of proanthocyanidins from peanut skin because they are fast processes with low solvent consumption, generally green solvents, such carbon dioxide, ethanol, water, or their mixtures (Mazzutti et al., 2017; Rifna et al., 2021).
High-pressure methods and other alternative techniques (like MAE and ultrasound) are established procedures, with well-known properties and advantages. Ameer et al. (2017) presented a comprehensive review about these green methods for polyphenol extraction, comparing efficiencies, applications, and characteristics. Also, several works proposed sequential high-pressure extractions to value different biomasses, such as peanut (Sorita et al., 2020), cacao (Mazzutti et al., 2018), and tamarind (Martins et al., 2020) by-products.
Porto and Natolino (2017) applied SFE with CO2, combined with ethanol or water as co-solvents, to recover proanthocyanidins from grape seeds. The process optimization consisted of following a Box-Behnken design to study the effects of pressure, co-solvent amount, and CO2 flow rate on polyphenol and proanthocyanidins extraction. The best condition (80 bar, CO2 flow rate of 6 kg h−1 and 20% (v/v) of ethanol as co-solvent) provided more than 10 mg g−1 of dry biomass of monomeric proanthocyanidins and above 8 mg g−1 of dry biomass of oligomeric proanthocyanidins.
PLE, a promising green method, was recently used by Rossi et al. (2020) to obtain proanthocyanidins from peanut skin at 7 MPa, 220 °C, and 7 g min−1 of ethanol/water (60:40 v/v) as solvent. The recovered extract had 24 compounds identified by HPLC–ESI–MS/MS, represented by procyanidin dimers (about 75%), monomeric flavonoids (4.31%), and proanthocyanidin dimmers (about 5%). The extract quality suggests the high-pressure PLE method as an alternative to value industrial peanut skin.
Other non-conventional promising techniques, such as MAE (Chen et al., 2016), sub-critical water extraction (SWE) (Bodoira et al., 2017), and ionic liquid extraction (Liu et al., 2012), have also been applied for the recovery of proanthocyanidins from different feedstocks. Table 2 shows different raw materials used as source of proanthocyanidins, recovered by green extraction techniques. Table 2 data also list the solvents used, extraction parameters, content of recovered proanthocyanidins, and suggested applications.
Chen et al. (2020a) used MAE and conventional maceration with ethanol/water (94:6 v/v) to recover proanthocyanidins from grape seeds. Higher content of proanthocyanidins, in terms of catechin equivalent (CE), was provided by MAE at 170 °C for 55 min (56.37 mg CE g−1 dry peanut skin) compared to maceration (9.70 mg CE g−1 dry peanut skin). This behavior is justified by microwaves that increase solvent penetration into the solid material, improving the extraction yield.
The use of high-pressure green methods to obtain proanthocyanidins from different sources is still very limited, particularly from peanut skin. Some proanthocyanidins sources, listed at Table 2, are lingonberry pomace, peanut skin, and cranberry pomace, which provided the highest proanthocyanidins content by PLE recovery. For instance, Kitrytė et al. (2020) and Tamkutė et al. (2020) used SWE at 10.3 MPa and 130 °C to recover proanthocyanidins from cranberry (806.44 mg g−1 of biomass) and from lingonberry pomace (289.59 mg g−1 of biomass), respectively. Rossi et al. (2020) used ethanol/ water (60:40 v/v) at 7 MPa and 220 °C to recover proanthocyanidins from peanut skin, reaching yield of 75% and 0.05% (w/w) for procyanidin and proanthocyanidin dimers, respectively. These results show that high-pressure methods are sustainable for proanthocyanidin recovery.
Food and Pharmaceutical Uses of Proanthocyanidin/Procyanidin-Rich Extracts from Peanut Skin
Considering the numerous health benefits from proanthocyanidins (the “Proanthocyanidins/Procyanidins from Peanut By-products” section), useful for food and pharmaceutical formulations, it is relevant to develop green strategies that can be industrially used for their successful recovery and quality application. Therefore, it is relevant to know the properties of these components in order to provide successful applications. Table 3 summarizes studies related to food and pharmaceutical uses of proanthocyanidins from peanut by-products, listing applications, bioactivities associated, and most relevant results.
Pharmaceutical Applications
Proanthocyanidins show potential benefits for different pharmaceutical applications (Table 3). Tatsuno et al. (2012) show that proanthocyanidin extracts from peanut skin, obtained by water maceration, have beneficial effects on human skins. The use of 200 µg mL−1 of extract decreased melanogenesis in cultured human melanoma (HMV-II co-stimulated with phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate), reducing production of inflammatory cytokines (at 100 µg mL−1), tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-6, in cultured human monocytic THP-1 cell. Proanthocyanidin dimers and trimers had stronger inhibitory activity, related to melanogenesis and inflammatory cytokine production, than the monomer or the tetramers. These promising results inspire the use of SWE or PLE with water as solvent due to the high pressure and temperature conditions, which can reduce the solvent’s surface tension and viscosity, increasing the proanthocyanidin recovery.
The procyanidins isolated from peanut skins, obtained by deionized boiling water (7.55 mg g−1 of peanut skin), also inhibited the degranulation of RBL-2H3 (rat basophilic leukemia cells), suggesting that peanut skin procyanidins are therapeutic effective against allergic diseases (Tomochika et al., 2011).
Liu et al. (2020) shows that procyanidin type B2 (Fig. 3(IV)) suppressed tumor cell proliferation and metabolism at in vitro (docking) and in vivo (xenograft and diethyl-nitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma mouse models) assays. They indicate that procyanidin type B2 appears to bind the catalytically active kinase domain of AKT (protein kinase B) and regulatory pleckstrin homology domain (protein domain), associated with liver cancer pathogenesis, and locking the protein in closed conformation, avoiding cancer cell multiplication. Also, A-type proanthocyanidin dimers from peanut skin have a protective effect against oxidative stress damage in prostate cancer (DU145 cells) induced by H2O2, maintaining normal cell cycle, inhibiting apoptosis, increasing the levels of antioxidants (catalase, total super oxide dismutase, and restored glutathione), and reducing the content of intracellular reactive oxygen species (Yan et al., 2021).
Camargo et al. (2017a) evaluated the inhibition of alpha-glucosidase and lipase activity by proanthocyanidin-rich extracts from peanut skin (pure and fractionated), obtained by shaker maceration with acetone solution (70%). The fractionated extract reached 76% inhibition of alpha-glucosidase activity, while the pure extract provided up to 94% inhibition of lipase activity. These results highlight the biological activities of peanut skin extracts, helping the control of the absorption of glucose and triglycerides by the inhibition of these enzymes.
Ho et al. (2019) evaluated the alpha-glucosidase inhibition by proanthocyanidins from peanut skin through in silico docking assays. The results show good inhibitory activity performance from A-type proanthocyanidins, with IC50 (concentration required to reduce 50% the enzyme activity) of 9.72 µM against alpha-glucosidase, revealing hypoglycemic ability of proanthocyanidins.
Peanut skin extract, obtained by PLE with ethanol/water (60:40 v/v), containing 75% procyanidin dimers and 5% proanthocyanidin dimers, was tested by Rossi et al. (2020) in rat ileal epithelial cells (IEC-18), monkey kidney epithelial cells (Vero), and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), for toxicity evaluations. Concentrations up to 300 μg mL−1 for IEC-18 and Vero, and up to 250 μg mL−1 for PBMCs, show no cytotoxic effects. These are very high concentrations compared to IC50 between 3 and 12.5 μg mL−1, representing the antioxidant activity by ABTS and DPPH methods. These promising results show that proanthocyanidin-rich extracts from peanut skin have high antioxidant activity, at safe concentrations for normal cells, suggesting its use as excellent and accessible alternative for therapeutic formulations.
Verstraeten et al. (2005) highlighted the ability of types A and B procyanidins (dimers and trimers) from peanut skin to interact with phosphatidyl choline liposomes (specifically the polar headgroup), avoiding membrane cell damages (maintaining bilayer integrity) by oxidants and other molecules. Also, trimer absorption from the stomach was extremely limited, while monomers and dimers were readily detected from blood plasma. As addressed before, high-pressure extractions increase the monomer and dimer fractions from proanthocyanidins, improving food and pharmaceutical applications.
The effect of proanthocyanidin-rich extracts from peanut skin on gastrointestinal absorption of vegetable oil in rats (male Wistar rats) was investigated by Bansode et al. (2015). Rats administered with the extracts showed reduced plasma triglycerides and lower plasma very-low-density-lipoprotein levels compared to rats without peanut skin extract administration, suggesting hypolipidemic properties of the extract.
Neagu et al. (2015) showed that ethanolic extracts from the plants Alchemilla vulgaris and Filipendula ulmaria, rich in proanthocyanidins (77.66 and 130.00 µg mL−1, respectively), have acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity (77.03–98.39% at 3 mg mL−1), useful for the treatment of Alzheimer’s and degenerative diseases. In addition, Unusan (2020) indicated that proanthocyanidins from grape seed extracts are therapeutic agents for neuroinflammatory diseases such as Alzheimer’s. Therefore, considering the high proanthocyanidins content from peanut skins of 4.959 mg g−1 founded by Camargo et al. (2017a), it may be of relevance to evaluate the acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity, an attribute still not associated with peanut skin extracts.
The ethanolic extract from peanut skin exhibited antiviral in vitro activity against influenza types A and B (IC50 of 1.3 μg mL−1). The extract exhibited potent activity against the clinically isolate H1N1 virus from 2009 pandemic, with synergistic effect when combined with the approved anti-influenza drugs, oseltamivir and amantadine, implying that peanut skin extracts may have potential application in the development of new therapeutic approaches for influenza management (Makau et al., 2018).
Recent studies of dynamic molecular simulation (in silico, molecular docking) suggested the proanthocyanidins’ potential to inhibit the coronavirus disease (COVID-19 global pandemic), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Maroli et al., 2020; Zhu & Xie, 2020). The coronavirus infective cycle and the main virus structure are presented in Fig. 4 (adapted from Maroli et al., 2020; Zhu & Xie, 2020). Briefly, from Fig. 4A (infective life cycle), the virus spike protein (S) binds to ACE2 enzyme receptor (angiotensin-converting enzyme), the lungs’ major binding receptor to SARS-CoV-2, which is activated by proteolytic cleavage with human type 2 transmembrane serine (TMPRSS2), allowing the virus entry into human cells (Fig. 4(A.1)). Then, the uncoated virus delivers RNA into the cytoplasm by translation and replication (Fig. 4(A.2, A.3)). Finally, the replicated RNA virus is coated, and new virus is expelled of the cell (Fig. 4(A.4, A.5)).
The inhibition mechanism of SARS-CoV-2, by therapeutic medicines such as proanthocyanidins/procyanidins, is still poorly elucidated, although molecular docking simulation strategies may justify the therapeutic use of proanthocyanidins/procyanidins (PA) against the COVID-19 virus, with action mechanism suggested at Fig. 4B (Adapted from Maroli et al., 2020; Zhu & Xie, 2020). This mechanism consists in the PA ability to bind with enzymes and proteins involved in the virus replication cycle (Fig. 4B), the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S), ACE2 receptor, and the transmembrane serine protein (TMPRSS2), destabilizing the binding between virus and human cell and preventing virus replication (Maroli et al., 2020; Zhu & Xie, 2020). Then, PA activity may alleviate the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and modulate the immune response.
Food Applications
Proanthocyanidins have astringency, bitterness, sourness, and sweetness, and contribute to salivary viscosity, aroma, and color formation of food products. Therefore, these components are used as additives in food formulations, enhancing microbial stability, foamability, oxidative, and heat stability (Okino et al., 2021; Rauf et al., 2019). Table 3 also presents the studies related to food applications of proanthocyanidins recovered from peanut skin.
The use of proanthocyanidins from peanut skins successfully inhibited retrogradation properties of maize starch for 21-day storage (Wang et al., 2020). This powerful effect improves quality and extends shelf-life of starch-based food products, suggesting that proanthocyanidin-rich extracts from peanut skin can increase the quality of starch-based foods providing effects such as antioxidant and hypolipidemic.
Peanut skin extracts (methanol maceration), rich in proanthocyanidins, reduced 60% oxidation of ground beef storage for 14 days, reducing cooking loss and microbial growth, without an aroma effect (O’Keefe & Wang, 2006). Munekata et al. (2016) observed redness loss reduction, prevention of lipid and protein oxidation, and decreasing sensory attributes changes (red color intensity, superficial discoloration, and off-odor) in sheep patties added with peanut skin extract (proanthocyanidins rich in pentamers, tetramers, trimers, and oligomers), for 20 days of storage at 2 °C. These results suggest the extract potential as natural antioxidant, replacing synthetic ones such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT).
Camargo et al. (2014) shows that peanut skin improved the total phenolic content, fiber, antioxidant capacities, and moisture of cookies (at concentrations from 1.3 to 2.5%), while carbohydrate concentration was decreased. The cookies fortified by peanut skin were well accepted by sensorial analysis. In addition, procyanidin trimers and tetramers were identified by HPLC–DAD-ESI–MS from the phenolic fraction (extracted with acetone water solution 70:30 v/v) of the cookies.
Gamma irradiation of food products has been used to reduce and/or eliminate microorganisms, improving food safety, although it may affect sensory attributes by inducing oxidation. Then, Camargo et al. (2017a) compared antioxidant activity of peanut skin extracts, obtained by acetone:water solution (70:30 v/v), with 4.959 mg of proanthocyanidins g−1 dry peanut skin, with that from BHA, a synthetic antioxidant. Then, the extract was added to salmon and submitted to gamma irradiation (3.0 kGy at 3.75 kGy h−1). The results show the extract prevented oxidation up to 63% of non-irradiated salmon samples, and 37% of gamma-irradiated samples. No difference was found comparing the antioxidant activity from BHA and the extract, showing that natural proanthocyanidins can prevent gamma irradiation–induced oxidation. The same extract also inhibited the growth of gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus) and gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, and Escherichia coli) (Camargo et al., 2017b). Also, Levy et al. (2017) demonstrated the antimicrobial effect of peanut skin extracts, rich in proanthocyanidins, obtained by ultrasound with acetone, water, and acetic acid (70:28:2, v/v/v) from defatted sample, against the pathogens L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and S. typhimurium.
Undesirable non-enzymatic reaction, namely glycation (reaction of free amino groups from proteins with free carbonyl groups of reducing sugar), can occur in foods during processing, producing glycation end products (AGEs). Accumulation of AGEs in human tissues are directly related to diabetic complications, Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular disease, and kidney dysfunction. Then, Zhao et al. (2021) showed that peanut skin extracts (with proanthocyanidins content of 85.69%) strongly inhibited the AGE formation, serving as anti-glycation agent for food products. Then, considering the pharmaceutical and food applications of proanthocyanidins, their functions must be preserved for adequate use, for instance by encapsulation strategies (next section) that may avoid structural and functional changes during processing.
Encapsulation Strategies to Improve Proanthocyanidin/Procyanidin Bioavailability
Proanthocyanidin/procyanidin bioavailability affects their bio-accessibility and bioactivity (biological activities). Bio-accessibility makes proanthocyanidins bioavailable for absorption during gastrointestinal digestion (or assimilation through intestinal epithelium), and intestinal and hepatic metabolism. The bioactivity happens after epithelium assimilation and transport to specific tissue, generating the correspondent physiological responses, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and others (Galanakis, 2021; Okino et al., 2021).
The in vivo biotransformation of proanthocyanidins, such as pH gastrointestinal degradation, rapid catabolism at upper gastrointestinal tract and liver (or monomer and dimer degradation during transport), fast urinary excretion, and bacterial gastrointestinal metabolism, affects potential bioactivity of proanthocyanidins. Also, they tend to interact with proteins, forming a complex, and with mucus and other intestine components (starches and digestive enzymes), reducing its availability and efficacy with progressing time (Ge et al., 2015).
The direct application of proanthocyanidins in foodstuff and pharmaceutical products can be hindered by their astringent taste and susceptibility to changes induced by temperature, oxygen, extreme pH values, or light exposure (Okino et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2015). Also, the direct application can reduce storage stability, with progressive presence of brown color from oxidation and condensation reactions, affecting appearance and taste (Liu et al., 2017). Furthermore, proanthocyanidins have high water solubility, inhibiting their penetration into food oily systems (Chen et al., 2020b) and also into the cell membrane, since it mainly composed by lipids (specifically phospholipids).
To overcome these limitations and improve the proanthocyanidins’ functional properties for food and pharmaceutical applications, encapsulation strategies, by different techniques, have produced micro- or nanoparticles of peanut skin proanthocyanidins (Unusan, 2020). An efficient encapsulation process requires a careful selection of the wall material, followed by the appropriate encapsulation method and a proper characterization of the produced particles. Then, the incorporation of the loaded particles into the food or pharmaceutical matrices and kinetics of biocomponents released from the particles are also relevant to define the adequate strategy.
GRAS Materials Derived From By-products–New Wall Barrier Tendency
Appropriate wall materials should have the ability to isolate and protect the core product, such as proanthocyanidin-rich extracts, from external environmental conditions. It can contribute to incorporate the encapsulated particles (core + wall material) in different food systems, improving solubilization, reducing degradation (oxidation or hydrolysis), and, consequently, protecting its biological activity. The type of wall material also affects the particles’ stability and the encapsulation efficiency of loaded compounds, and, ultimately, controls the core release (Geranpour et al., 2020).
For proanthocyanidins, adequate wall materials should suppress the first-pass metabolism alterations, avoiding molecular changes, and allowing circulation to exert their bioactivity (Bora et al., 2018). The most common materials used to encapsulate proanthocyanidins are maltodextrin (Calomeni et al., 2017) vegetable fat (Holkem & Favaro-Trindade, 2020), gum arabic, pectin, cashew gum, carboxymethylcellulose, and κ-carrageenan (Souza et al., 2018).
Besides, GRAS products are the preferential wall materials for food applications, but they also should be inexpensive, tasteless, soluble in typical solvents, biodegradable, and nonreactive with the target compound (Bora et al., 2018; Geranpour et al., 2020).
Recent sustainable policies have encouraged the use of biopolymers, derived from industrial co-products, which stimulate the circular economy, as green alternatives for wall materials (Geranpour et al., 2020). Sorita et al. (2020) suggested the recovery, by green methods, of proteins, carbohydrates, and fibers from peanut meal, a by-product from peanut oil production. Then, these recovered products (proteins, carbohydrates, and fibers) can be applied as wall materials to encapsulate proanthocyanidins from peanut skin, a strategy that contributes to the biorefinery concept, and industrial “zero waste.”
Trends and Recent Advancements in Encapsulation Methods
The literature reports three classes of methods that have been used for micro- or nanoparticle formulations. The method used to produce the particles affects the encapsulation efficiency and can be classified as (i) physical methods: spray-drying and freeze-drying (Geranpour et al., 2020; Okino et al., 2021; Sorita et al., 2021; Waterhouse et al., 2017); (ii) physical–chemical methods: coacervation, emulsification, and supercritical fluid micronization (Mendonça et al., 2019; Rudke et al., 2019); and (iii) chemical methods: interfacial polymerization and complexation by molecular inclusion (Vakilinezhad et al., 2019).
Spray-drying is the most common physical method used for the encapsulation of peanut skin extracts rich in proanthocyanidins (or procyanidins), probably due to its feasibility, easy operation, and scale-up, with no organic solvent needed, and good benefit–cost ratio (Geranpour et al., 2020). Calomeni et al. (2017) used a spray-dryer to encapsulate procyanidin-rich extract from peanut skin using maltodextrin as encapsulating agent. The resulting particles (proanthocyanidin powder) show remarkable 120-day stability, suggesting its use as a natural additive (colorant) in food formulation. A solubility increase, compared to non-encapsulated power, was observed by Constanza et al. (2012) for procyanidin-rich extract, from peanut skin, encapsulated in maltodextrin by spray-dryer.
Complex coacervation was also applied to protect proanthocyanidins and/or procyanidins from peanut skin by Razola-Díaz et al. (2021), with high load capacity and low temperature, avoiding component degradation. Solid-lipid microparticles, composed of proanthocyanidins and probiotics (Lactobacillus paracasei and Bifidobacterium animali subsp. Lactis), were produced by Holkem and Favaro-Trindade (2020) to improve proanthocyanidin solubility in oil systems. These studies show the benefits of encapsulation to improve the use of procyanidin- and/or proanthocyanidin-rich extracts as natural additive for food industries, although complementary data about digestibility, bioavailability, and release from the particles are necessary for specific applications.
Future Perspectives for Proanthocyanidin-Based Products from Peanut Skin
Food by-products are gaining increasing attention as alternative biomasses, within the new biorefinery approach, because they can be converted into high-value chemical components, besides reducing industrial residues. Then, extraction and encapsulation strategies can enable adequate uses of the recovered products in food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, green extraction techniques, which have been stimulated by the environmental politics, can provide proanthocyanidin-rich extracts from peanut skin, with high quality and functionalities, as discussed in the “Encapsulation Strategies to Improve Proanthocyanidin/Procyanidin Bioavailability” section. Then, the viability evaluation of extraction and encapsulation methods, based on bioeconomy strategies, is necessary to innovate the peanut industry.
The production of high-value and innovative chemicals from agro-food by-products is an urgent objective, within the Sustainable Development Goals from United Nations (SDG-UN), although the polices are mainly focused on the use of biomasses to obtain bioenergy. Also, the use of by-products in conventional industries presents some resistance, and requires new procedures and equipment, complicating the implementation. To overcome these inconveniences, innovative and long-term wide polices are necessary, such as tax reduction and subsidies for recycling, and increase in research investments to promote the circular economy and by-product industrial use. Additionally, the creation of regional companies or cooperatives for by-product processing would be a promising strategy, reducing initial investments and increasing profitability, adding value to underused by-products (Langen et al., 2021). These strategies for peanut industry may help the circular economy, with the production of proanthocyanidin-rich extracts and other chemical from peanut skin, with several applications.
Conclusions
Phenolic fractions (rich in proanthocyanidins/procyanidins) are health-benefit molecules, valuable for food and pharmaceutical industries, due to effects as antioxidant, anti-inflammation, neuroprotective, anticancer, lipid-lowering, bacteriostatic, and hypotensive. The valorization of peanut skin is relevant for circular economy due to their high proanthocyanidin content, which can be recovered from the biomass, that otherwise would be underused, and reintegrated in the processing chain. Unconventional extractions techniques such as SFE, PLE, MAE, and SWE can overcome the current drawbacks of conventional methods, leading to a greener process. Also, incorporating proanthocyanidins in micro/nanocapsules can improve their bioavailability and solubility in different systems. Then, the use of proanthocyanidins, in micro- or nanoparticles, in foods or medicines, must be validated by large double-blind clinical trials, to attest the nontoxic effect of proanthocyanidins from peanut skin.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Ameer, K., Shahbaz, H. M., & Kwon, J. H. (2017). Green extraction methods for polyphenols from plant matrices and their byproducts: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12253
An, Q., Gong, X., Le, L., Zhu, D., Xiang, D., Geng, F., et al. (2021). Prospects for proanthocyanidins from grape seed: Extraction technologies and diverse bioactivity. Food Reviews International. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1906699
Andersen-Civil, A. I. S., Leppä, M. M., Thamsborg, S. M., Salminen, J. P., & Williams, A. R. (2021). Structure-function analysis of purified proanthocyanidins reveals a role for polymer size in suppressing inflammatory responses. Communications Biology, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02408-3
Appeldoorn, M. M., Sanders, M., Vincken, J. P., Cheynier, V., le Guernevé, C., Hollman, P. C. H., & Gruppen, H. (2009). Efficient isolation of major procyanidin A-type dimers from peanut skins and B-type dimers from grape seeds. Food Chemistry, 117(4), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.047
Bansode, R. R., Randolph, P., Ahmedna, M., Hurley, S., Hanner, T., Baxter, S. A. S., et al. (2014). Bioavailability of polyphenols from peanut skin extract associated with plasma lipid lowering function. Food Chemistry, 148, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.129
Bansode, R. R., Randolph, P., Ahmedna, M., Williams, L. L., & Yu, J. (2015). Bioavailability and hypolipidemic effects of peanut skin polyphenols. Journal of Medicinal Food, 18(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2014.0060
Belwal, T., Chemat, F., Venskutonis, P. R., Cravotto, G., Jaiswal, D. K., Bhatt, I. D., et al. (2020). Recent advances in scaling-up of non-conventional extraction techniques: Learning from successes and failures. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 127, 115895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115895
Benvenutti, L., Zielinski, A. A. F., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2021). Jaboticaba (Myrtaceae cauliflora) fruit and its by-products: Alternative sources for new foods and functional components. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 112(April), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.044
Blade, C., Arola, L., & Salvado, M. (2010). Hypolipidemic effects of proanthocyanidins and their underlying biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 54, 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200900476
Bodoira, R., Rossi, Y., Montenegro, M., Maestri, D., & Velez, A. (2017). Extraction of antioxidant polyphenolic compounds from peanut skin using water-ethanol at high pressure and temperature conditions. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 128, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.05.011
Bodoira, R., Velez, A., Maestri, D., & Herrera, J. (2019). Bioactive compounds obtained from oilseed by-products with subcritical fluids: Effects on Fusarium verticillioides growth. Waste and Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00839-y
Bora, A. F. M., Ma, S., Li, X., & Liu, L. (2018). Application of microencapsulation for the safe delivery of green tea polyphenols in food systems: Review and recent advances. Food Research International, 105(59), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.047
Calomeni, A., de Souza, V. B., Tulini, F. L., Thomazini, M., Ostroschi, L. C., de Alencar, S. M., et al. (2017). Characterization of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of spray-dried extracts from peanut skins. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 105, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2017.08.001
Camargo, A. C., de Souza Vieira, T. M. F., Regitano-D’Arce, M. A. B., Calori-Domingues, M. A., & Canniatti-Brazaca, S. G. (2012). Gamma radiation effects on peanut skin antioxidants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(3), 3073–3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033073
Camargo, A. C., Regitano-d’Arce, M. A. B., Rasera, G. B., Canniatti-Brazaca, S. G., do Prado-Silva, L., Alvarenga, V. O., et al. (2017a). Phenolic acids and flavonoids of peanut by-products: Antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial effects. Food Chemistry, 237, 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.046
Camargo, A. C., Regitano-d’Arce, M. A. B., & Shahidi, F. (2017b). Phenolic profile of peanut by-products: Antioxidant potential and inhibition of alpha-glucosidase and lipase activities. JAOCS, Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 94(7), 959–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-017-2996-9
Camargo, A. C., Vidal, C. M. M., Canniatti-Brazaca, S. G., & Shahidi, F. (2014). Fortification of cookies with peanut skins: Effects on the composition, polyphenols, antioxidant properties, and sensory quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(46), 11228–11235. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf503625p
Candela, F. M., Giordano, W. F., Quiroga, P. L., Escobar, F. M., Mañas, F., Roma, D. A., et al. (2020). Evaluation of cellular safety and the chemical composition of the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) ethanolic extracts. Heliyon, 6(10), e05119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05119
Chemat, F., Abert-vian, M., Fabiano-tixier, A. S., Strube, J., Uhlenbrock, L., Gunjevic, V., & Cravotto, G. (2019). Green extraction of natural products. Origins, current status, and future challenges. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118, 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.05.037
Chen, F., Du, X., Zu, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, F. (2016). Microwave-assisted method for distillation and dual extraction in obtaining essential oil, proanthocyanidins and polysaccharides by one-pot process from Cinnamomi Cortex. Separation and Purification Technology, 164, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.03.018
Chen, J., Thilakarathna, W. P. D. W., Astatkie, T., & Rupasinghe, H. P. V. (2020a). Optimization of catechin and proanthocyanidin recovery from grape seeds using microwave-assisted extraction. Biomolecules, 10(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020243
Chen, S., Shen, X., Tao, W., Mao, G., Wu, W., Zhou, S., et al. (2020). Preparation of a novel emulsifier by self-assembling of proanthocyanidins from Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) leaves with gelatin. Food Chemistry, 319, 126570.
Chukwumah, Y., Walker, L., Vogler, B., & Verghese, M. (2012). Profiling of bioactive compounds in cultivars of Runner and Valencia peanut market-types using liquid chromatography/APCI mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, 132(1), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.050
Chupin, L., Maunu, S. L., Reynaud, S., Pizzi, A., Charrier, B., & Charrier-EL Bouhtoury, F. (2015). Microwave assisted extraction of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) bark: Impact of particle size and characterization. Industrial Crops and Products, 65, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.052
Constanza, K. E., White, B. L., Davis, J. P., Sanders, T. H., & Dean, L. L. (2012). Value-added processing of peanut skins: Antioxidant capacity, total phenolics, and procyanidin content of spray-dried extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 10776–10783. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf3035258
Dean, L. L. (2020). Extracts of peanut skins as a source of bioactive compounds: Methodology and applications. Applied Sciences (switzerland), 10(23), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238546
Dean, L. L., Klevorn, C. M., & Hess, B. J. (2016). Minimizing the negative flavor attributes and evaluating consumer acceptance of chocolate fortified with peanut skin extracts. Journal of Food Science, 81, S2824–S2830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13533
Dong, X. Q., Zou, B., Zhang, Y., Ge, Z. Z., Du, J., & Li, C. M. (2013). Preparation of A-type proanthocyanidin dimers from peanut skins and persimmon pulp and comparison of the antioxidant activity of A-type and B-type dimers. Fitoterapia, 91, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2013.08.019
Dudek, M. K., Gliński, V. B., Davey, M. H., Sliva, D., Kaźmierski, S., & Gliński, J. A. (2017). Trimeric and tetrameric A-type procyanidins from peanut skins. Journal of Natural Products, 80(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00946
Francisco, M. L. D. L., & Resurreccion, A. V. A. (2009). Development of a reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) procedure for the simultaneous determination of phenolic compounds in peanut skin extracts. Food Chemistry, 117(2), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.110
Galanakis, C. M. (2021). Functionality of food components and emerging technologies. Foods, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010128
Ge, Z. Z., Dong, X. Q., Zhu, W., Zhang, Y., & Li, C. M. (2015). Metabolites and changes in antioxidant activity of A-type and B-type proanthocyanidin dimers after incubation with rat intestinal microbiota. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(41), 8991–8998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03657
Geranpour, M., Assadpour, E., & Jafari, S. M. (2020). Recent advances in the spray drying encapsulation of essential fatty acids and functional oils. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.028
Hamed, A. M., Taha, S. H., Darwish, A. A., & Aly, E. (2021). Antioxidant activity and some quality characteristics of buffalo yoghurt fortified with peanut skin extract powder. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(6), 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04835-2
He, F., Pan, Q. H., Shi, Y., & Duan, C. Q. (2008). Biosynthesis and genetic regulation of proanthocyanidins in plants. Molecules, 13(10), 2674–2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674
Ho, S. L., Lin, Y., Tsai, S., & Lee, S. (2019). In silico docking analysis of A-type proanthocyanidins to alpha-glucosidase constructed by correlation with in vitro bioassay. Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry, 5(4), 47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jddmc.20190504.11
Holkem, A. T., & Favaro-Trindade, C. S. (2020). Potential of solid lipid microparticles covered by the protein-polysaccharide complex for protection of probiotics and proanthocyanidin-rich cinnamon extract. Food Research International, 136(June), 109520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109520
Ju, A., & Song, K. B. (2020). Active biodegradable films based on water soluble polysaccharides from white jelly mushroom (Tremella fuciformis) containing roasted peanut skin extract. Lwt, 126(January), 109293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109293
Kandhare, A. D., Bodhankar, S. L., Singh, V., Mohan, V., & Thakurdesai, P. A. (2013). Anti-asthmatic effects of type-A procyanidine polyphenols from cinnamon bark in ovalbumin-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in laboratory animals. Biomedicine and Aging Pathology, 3(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomag.2013.01.003
Katiyar, S. K., Sciences, E. H., Obesity, N., & Affairs, V. (2017). Dietary proanthocyanidins inhibit UV radiation-induced skin tumor development through functional activation of the immune system. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 60(6), 1374–1382. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201501026.Dietary
Kitrytė, V., Kavaliauskaitė, A., Tamkutė, L., Pukalskienė, M., Syrpas, M., & Rimantas Venskutonis, P. (2020). Zero waste biorefining of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) pomace into functional ingredients by consecutive high pressure and enzyme assisted extractions with green solvents. Food Chemistry, 322, 126767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126767
Lan, X., Qiang, W., Yang, Y., Gao, T., Guo, J., Du, L., et al. (2020). Physicochemical stability of safflower oil body emulsions during food processing. Lwt, 132(June), 109838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109838
Larrauri, M., Zunino, M. P., Zygadlo, J. A., Grosso, N. R., & Nepote, V. (2016). Chemical characterization and antioxidant properties of fractions separated from extract of peanut skin derived from different industrial processes. Industrial Crops and Products, 94, 964–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.066
Le Bourvellec, C., & Renard, C. M. G. C. (2018). Interactions between polyphenols and macromolecules: Effect of tannin structure. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21486-8
Lee, C. H., Kang, J. H., Woo, H. J., & Song, K. B. (2021). Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculated on fresh-cut romaine lettuce by peanut skin extract/benzethonium chloride emulsion washing. Food Control, 119, 107479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107479
Levy, J., Boyer, R. R., Neilson, A. P., O’Keefe, S. F., Chu, H. S. S., Williams, R. C., et al. (2017). Evaluation of peanut skin and grape seed extracts to inhibit growth of foodborne pathogens. Food Science and Nutrition, 5(6), 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.503
Lewis, W. E., Harris, G. K., Sanders, T. H., White, B. L., & Dean, L. L. (2013). Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of peanut skin extracts. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 04(08), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.48a003
Liu, C., Li, M., Yang, J., Xiong, L., & Sun, Q. (2017). Fabrication and characterization of biocompatible hybrid nanoparticles from spontaneous co-assembly of casein/gliadin and proanthocyanidin. Food Hydrocolloids, 73, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.06.036
Liu, G., Shi, A., Wang, N., Li, M., He, X., Yin, C., et al. (2020). Polyphenolic proanthocyanidin-B2 suppresses proliferation of liver cancer cells and hepatocellular carcinogenesis through directly binding and inhibiting AKT activity. Redox Biology, 37, 101701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101701
Liu, Y., Yang, L., Zu, Y., Zhao, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2012). Development of an ionic liquid-based microwave-assisted method for simultaneous extraction and distillation for determination of proanthocyanidins and essential oil in Cortex cinnamomi. Food Chemistry, 135(4), 2514–2521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.001
Lorenzo, J. M., Munekata, P. E. S., Sant’Ana, A. S., Carvalho, R. B., Barba, F. J., Toldrá, F., et al. (2018). Main characteristics of peanut skin and its role for the preservation of meat products. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.007
Lou, H., Yuan, H., Yamazaki, Y., Sasaki, T., & Oka, S. (2001). Alkaloids and flavonoids from peanut skins. Planta Medica, 67, 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-14319
Ma, Y., Kerr, W. L., Cavender, G. A., Swanson, R. B., Hargrove, J. L., & Pegg, R. B. (2013). Effect of peanut skin incorporation on the color, texture and total phenolics content of peanut butters. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 36, 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2012.00693.x
Makau, J. N., Watanabe, K., Mohammed, M. M. D., & Nishida, N. (2018). Antiviral activity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) skin extract against human influenza viruses. Journal of Medicinal Food, 21(8), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2017.4121
Maroli, N., Bhasuran, B., Natarajan, J., & Kolandaivel, P. (2020). The potential role of procyanidin as a therapeutic agent against SARS-CoV-2: A text mining, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 40(3), 1230–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1823887
Martins, C. M., Ferro, D. M., de Brito, E. S., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2020). Industrial relevance of Tamarindus indica L. by-products as source of valuable active metabolites. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 66, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102518
Mazzutti, S., Riehl, C. A. S., Ibañez, E., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2017). Green-based methods to obtain bioactive extracts from Plantago major and Plantago lanceolata. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 119, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.09.018
Mazzutti, S., Rodrigues, L. G. G., Mezzomo, N., Venturi, V., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2018). Integrated green-based processes using supercritical CO2 and pressurized ethanol applied to recover antioxidant compouds from cocoa (Theobroma cacao) bean hulls. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 135, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.12.039
Mendonça, F. M. R., Polloni, A. E., Junges, A., da Silva, R. S., Rubira, A. F., Borges, G. R., et al. (2019). Encapsulation of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed oil in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) by SFEE technique. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 152, 104556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104556
Monagas, M., Garrido, I., Lebrón-Aguilar, R., Carmen Gómez-Cordovés, M., Rybarczyk, A., Amarowicz, R., & Bartolomé, B. (2009). Comparative flavan-3-ol profile and antioxidant capacity of roasted peanut, hazelnut, and almond skins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57(22), 10590–10599. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901391a
Moro, K. I. B., Bender, A. B. B., da Silva, L. P., & Penna, N. G. (2021). Green extraction methods and microencapsulation technologies of phenolic compounds from grape pomace: A review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 14, 1407–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-021-02665-4
Munekata, P. E. S., Fernandes, R. P. P., Melo, M. P., Trindade, M. A., & Lorenzo, J. M. (2016). Influence of peanut skin extract on shelf-life of sheep patties. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 6(7), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.05.002
Muñoz-Arrieta, R., Esquivel-Alvarado, D., Alfaro-Viquez, E., Alvarez-Valverde, V., Krueger, C. G., & Reed, J. D. (2021). Nutritional and bioactive composition of Spanish, Valencia, and Virginia type peanut skins. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 98, 103816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103816
Neagu, E., Paun, G., Albu, C., & Radu, G. L. (2015). Assessment of acetylcholinesterase and tyrosinase inhibitory and antioxidant activity of Alchemilla vulgaris and Filipendula ulmaria extracts. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 52, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.01.026
Neto, R. T., Santos, S. A. O., Oliveira, J., & Silvestre, A. J. D. (2020). Biorefinery of high polymerization degree proanthocyanidins in the context of circular economy. Industrial Crops and Products, 151, 112450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112450
Neuenfeldt, N. H., de Moraes, D. P., de Deus, C., Barcia, M. T., & de Menezes, C. R. (2022). Blueberry phenolic composition and improved stability by microencapsulation. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 15, 750–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-021-02749-1
O’Keefe, S. F., & Wang, H. (2006). Effects of peanut skin extract on quality and storage stability of beef products. Meat Science, 73(2), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.12.001
Odai, T., Terauchi, M., Kato, K., Hirose, A., & Miyasaka, N. (2019). Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract on vascular endothelial function in participants with prehypertension: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients, 11, 2844. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122844
Okino, S., Kokawa, M., Islam, Z., & Kitamura, Y. (2021). Effects of apple juice manufacturing processes on procyanidin concentration and nondestructive analysis by fluorescence fingerprint. Food and Bioprocess Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-021-02601-6/Published
Oldoni, T. L. C., Melo, P. S., Massarioli, A. P., Moreno, I. A. M., Bezerra, R. M. N., Rosalen, P. L., et al. (2016). Bioassay-guided isolation of proanthocyanidins with antioxidant activity from peanut (Arachis hypogaea) skin by combination of chromatography techniques. Food Chemistry, 192, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.004
Porto, C., & Natolino, A. (2017). Supercritical fluid extraction of polyphenols from grape seed (Vitis vinifera): Study on process variables and kinetics. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 130, 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.02.013
Putra, N. R., Rizkiyah, D. N., Abdul Aziz, A. H., Machmudah, S., Jumakir, J., Waluyo, W., & Che Yunus, M. A. (2021). Procyanidin and proanthocyanidin extraction from Arachis hypogaea skins by using supercritical carbon dioxide: Optimization and modeling. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45(9), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15689
Rauf, A., Imran, M., Abu-Izneid, T., Iahtisham-Ul-Haq, Patel, S., Pan, X., et al. (2019). Proanthocyanidins: A comprehensive review. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 116, 108999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108999
Razola-Díaz, M. D. C., Guerra-Hernández, E. J., García-Villanova, B., & Verardo, V. (2021). Recent developments in extraction and encapsulation techniques of orange essential oil. Food Chemistry, 354, 129575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129575
Rifna, E. J., Misra, N. N., & Dwivedi, M. (2021). Recent advances in extraction technologies for recovery of bioactive compounds derived from fruit and vegetable waste peels: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1952923
Rossi, Y. E., Bohl, L. P., Braber, N. L. V., Ballatore, M. B., Escobar, F. M., Bodoira, R., et al. (2020). Polyphenols of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) skin as bioprotectors of normal cells. Studies of cytotoxicity, cytoprotection and interaction with ROS. Journal of Functional Foods, 67, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2020.103862
Rudke, A. R., Heleno, S. A., Fernandes, I. P., Prieto, M. A., Gonçalves, O. H., Rodrigues, A. E., et al. (2019). Microencapsulation of ergosterol and Agaricus bisporus L. extracts by complex coacervation using whey protein and chitosan: Optimization study using response surface methodology. Lwt, 103, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.018
Sarnoski, P. J., Boyer, R. R., & O’Keefe, S. F. (2012a). Application of proanthocyanidins from peanut skins as a natural yeast inhibitory agent. Journal of Food Science, 77(4), M242–M249.
Sarnoski, P. J., Johnson, J. V., Reed, K. A., Tanko, J. M., & O’Keefe, S. F. (2012b). Separation and characterisation of proanthocyanidins in Virginia type peanut skins by LC-MSn. Food Chemistry, 131(3), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.081
Seabra, I. J., Dias, A. M. A., Braga, M. E. M., & De Sousa, H. C. (2012). High pressure solvent extraction of maritime pine bark: Study of fractionation, solvent flow rate and solvent composition. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 62, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2011.10.016
Shokoohi, Z., & Saghaian, S. (2022). Nexus of energy and food nutrition prices in oil importing and exporting countries: A panel VAR model. Energy, 255, 124416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124416
Singh, B., Singh, J. P., Kaur, A., & Singh, N. (2017). Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: A review. Food Research International, 101(September), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.026
Sorita, G. D., de Oliveira, A., Moreira, T. F. M., Leimann, F., & v., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2022). Green-based processes applied for valorization of peanut by-product: In vitro evaluation of antioxidant and enzymatic inhibition capacities. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 186, 105602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2022.105602
Sorita, G. D., Leimann, F. V., & Ferreira, S. R. S. (2020). Biorefinery approach: Is it an upgrade opportunity for peanut by-products? Trends in Food Science and Technology, 105, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.011
Sorita, G. D., Santamaria-Echart, A., Gozzo, A. M., Gonçalves, O. H., Leimann, F. V., Bona, E., et al. (2021). Lipid composition optimization in spray congealing technique and testing with curcumin-loaded microparticles. Advanced Powder Technology, 32(5), 1710–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.03.028
Souza, V. B., Thomazini, M., Echalar Barrientos, M. A., Nalin, C. M., Ferro-Furtado, R., Genovese, M. I., & Favaro-Trindade, C. S. (2018). Functional properties and encapsulation of a proanthocyanidin-rich cinnamon extract (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) by complex coacervation using gelatin and different polysaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids, 77, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.09.040
Sun, Y. A. N., Xiu, C., Liu, W. E. I., Tao, Y., Wang, J., & Qu, Y. I. (2016). Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract protects the retina against early diabetic injury by activating the Nrf2 pathway. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 11, 1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3033
Tamkutė, L., Liepuoniūtė, R., Pukalskienė, M., & Venskutonis, P. R. (2020). Recovery of valuable lipophilic and polyphenolic fractions from cranberry pomace by consecutive supercritical CO2 and pressurized liquid extraction. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 159, 104755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104755
Tatsuno, T., Jinno, M., Arima, Y., Kawabata, T., Hasegawa, T., Yahagi, N., et al. (2012). Anti-inflammatory and anti-melanogenic proanthocyanidin oligomers from peanut skin. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 35(6), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.35.909
Tomochika, K., Ibuka, A. S., Tamura, T., Mura, K., Abe, N., Onose, J. I., & Arai, S. (2011). Effects of peanut-skin procyanidin A1 on degranulation of RBL-2H3 cells. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 75(9), 1644–1648. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.110085
Unusan, N. (2020). Proanthocyanidins in grape seeds: An updated review of their health benefits and potential uses in the food industry. Journal of Functional Foods, 67, 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2020.103861
USDA. (2022). Major Vegetable Oils: World Supply and Distribution. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/oilseeds-world-markets-and-trade
Vakilinezhad, M. A., Amini, A., Dara, T., & Alipour, S. (2019). Methotrexate and Curcumin co-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles as a potential breast cancer therapeutic system: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Colloids and Surfaces b: Biointerfaces, 184, 110515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110515
van Langen, S. K., Vassillo, C., Ghisellini, P., Restaino, D., Passaro, R., & Ulgiati, S. (2021). Promoting circular economy transition: A study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128166
Vazquez-Flores, A. A., Martinez-Gonzalez, A. I., Alvarez-Parrilla, E., Díaz-Sánchez, Á. G., de la Rosa, L. A., González-Aguilar, G. A., & Aguilar, C. N. (2018). Proanthocyanidins with a low degree of polymerization are good inhibitors of digestive enzymes because of their ability to form specific interactions: A hypothesis. Journal of Food Science, 83(12), 2895–2902. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14386
Verstraeten, S. V., Hammerstone, J. F., Keen, C. L., Fraga, C. G., & Oteiza, P. I. (2005). Antioxidant and membrane effects of procyanidin dimers and trimers isolated from peanut and cocoa. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(12), 5041–5048. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf058018m
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., Liu, B., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Extraction and determination of protein from edible oil using aqueous biphasic systems of ionic liquids and salts. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 15(1), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-021-02738-4
Wang, M., Chen, J., Chen, S., Ye, X., & Liu, D. (2020). Inhibition effect of three common proanthocyanidins from grape seeds, peanut skins and pine barks on maize starch retrogradation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 252, 117172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117172
Waterhouse, G. I. N., Sun-Waterhouse, D., Su, G., Zhao, H., & Zhao, M. (2017). Spray-Drying of antioxidant-rich blueberry waste extracts; interplay between waste pretreatments and spray-drying process. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 10(6), 1074–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-017-1880-9
Xie, D. Y., & Dixon, R. A. (2005). Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis - Still more questions than answers? Phytochemistry, 66(18), 2127–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.01.008
Xu, M., Lv, C., Wang, H., Lu, Q., Ye, M., Zhu, X., & Liu, R. (2022). Peanut skin extract ameliorates high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis by regulating lipid metabolism, inflammation reaction and gut microbiota in ApoE−/− mice. Food Research International, 154, 111014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111014
Xu, Z., Wei, L., & hong, Ge, Z. zhen, Zhu, W., & Li, C. mei. (2015). Comparison of the degradation kinetics of A-type and B-type proanthocyanidins dimers as a function of pH and temperature. European Food Research and Technology, 240(4), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2375-9
Yan, F., Chen, L., Chen, W., Zhao, L., Lu, Q., & Liu, R. (2021). Protective effect of procyanidin A-type dimers against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in prostate DU145 cells through the MAPKs signaling pathway. Life Sciences, 266, 118908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118908
Ye, L., & Neilson, A. (2016). Comparison of A-type proanthocyanidins in cranberry and peanut skin extracts using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.1000209
Yu, J., Ahmedna, M., & Goktepe, I. (2010). Potential of peanut skin phenolic extract as antioxidative and antibacterial agent in cooked and raw ground beef. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 45(7), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02241.x
Yu, J., Ahmedna, M., Goktepe, I., & Dai, J. (2006). Peanut skin procyanidins: Composition and antioxidant activities as affected by processing. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2005.08.003
Zhang, H., Yerigui, Y., & Y., & Ma, C. (2013). Structures and antioxidant and intestinal disaccharidase inhibitory activities of A-type proanthocyanidins from peanut skin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(37), 8814–8820. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402518k
Zhao, C., Yang, X., Tian, H., & Yang, L. (2020). An improved method to obtain essential oil, flavonols and proanthocyanidins from fresh Cinnamomum japonicum Sieb. leaves using solvent-free microwave-assisted distillation followed by homogenate extraction. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 13(1), 2041–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.03.002
Zhao, L., Zhu, X., Yu, Y., He, L., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Liu, R. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of the anti-glycation effect of peanut skin extract. Food Chemistry, 362, 130169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130169
Zhu, Y., & Xie, D. Y. (2020). Docking characterization and in vitro inhibitory activity of flavan-3-ols and dimeric proanthocyanidins against the main protease activity of SARS-Cov-2. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.601316
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank CAPES/PROEX (Project 1624/2018) and CAPES/PRINT (Project 88887.310560/2018-00).
Funding
The authors received financial support from CAPES/PROEX, Project 1624/2018, and CAPES/PRINT, Project 88887.310560/2018–00.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Guilherme Dallarmi Sorita: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing of the original draft. Fernanda Vitória Leimann: writing–review and editing. Sandra Regina Salvador Ferreira: conceptualization; methodology; resources; writing–review and editing; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sorita, G.D., Leimann, F.V. & Ferreira, S.R.S. Phenolic Fraction from Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) By-product: Innovative Extraction Techniques and New Encapsulation Trends for Its Valorization. Food Bioprocess Technol 16, 726–748 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02901-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02901-5